Though this work is not about the Secured Party Creditor or S.P.C. “process” the fact this “process” and “status” effects the estate, and is one of the many seeds some explorers have planted, and which has yielded undesirable results, or no results at all, a brief discussion on this myth is warranted.
As the myth is often presented, the Birth Certificate being a bond, which the government does not want to give the value of, or does not believe the people can properly manage for themselves, one must pierce, or overcome the barrier erected between you and the funds associated with the Birth Certificate.
As many are instructed, several documents must be executed and filed. One such document is a trust of one variety or another; followed by a demand to have the funds associated with the Birth Certificate moved into this trust. When this is not done, or where the government remains silent on the matter, the explorer is instructed to file a claim, often in the billions of dollars, against the public agent and agency whom it is believed is impeding access to these funds.
The myth of the S.P.C. “process” morphed into a type of “status” wherein it was claimed that one is outside the government and modern society in large part. Though, to obtain this “status” as many champions of it have described, one must use the forms of the very government one claims to not be a part of. This is the first hint that there is something seriously off the mark.
This myth has grown and morphed, as a true weed will, into an unruly and destructive weed. In fact, this has grown to such an extent, and explorers have been so misled, that many have found they are now on a government watch list which the FBI has categorized as “Domestic Terrorists”. The courts, which one must often rely on, have turned away from any party claiming they are a “Sovereign Citizen”, a clearly uneducated misnomer, setting the personal journey to self- governance back ten (10) or more years.
For clarity, let’s take a look at the title of “Sovereign Citizen” and discover why this is something that does not and cannot exist. A simple review of the definitions will show the conflict in the two ideas, and how there can be no such thing as a “sovereign citizen.”
The word “Citizen” is defined as : “(I4c) 1. A person who. by either birth or naturalization, is a member of a political community, owing allegiance to the community and being entitled to enjoy all its civil rights and protections; a member of the civil state, entitled to all its privileges. Cf. RESIDENT; DOMICILIARY. (Blacks Law Dictionary, 9th Edition, pg. 278)
By these definitions, a citizen receives their rights by being a member of the political community as the members of the political community agree to recognize these rights. But, they can, and often do, choose to not recognize them when to do so is convenient, which is why they are also referred to here as “privileges”.
The word “sovereign” is defined as: “(18c) 1. A person, body, or state vested with independent and supreme authority. 2. The ruler of an independent state. – Also spelled sovran.” (Blacks Law Dictionary, 9th Edition, pg. 1523)
Here, the person is “vested” with “supreme authority”. Vested means “Having become a completed, consummated right for present or future enjoyment; not contingent; unconditional; absolute.” (Blacks Law Dictionary, 9th Edition, pg. 1699)
For those who have stood on this myth, and who are now in state detention, the delay in their comprehension is not only stunted by the walls and bars they are confined by, but also by the bias and frustration which they may carry. It is hoped that, as these explorers receive the information here, some clarity will blossom and comprehension can be reclaimed.
As the S.P.C. myth is so troublesome, it is good to comprehend that this myth is based on a series of facts which, alone and in proper context are in fact quite accurate. However, it must be recognized that the S.P.C. ”process” and “status” take these separate and lawful aspects out of their proper context and misapply them to a perverted purpose.
A simple logical test will prove this out for anyone who wishes to do so. Take for example the portion of the process where the S.P.C. adherent demands the funds from the birth certificate, and how it compares to a simple scenario. Here is the scenario: John must leave on a business trip, and entrusts his car with his roommate Mark. The car is held in trust by Mark, and Mark is the trustee of the car. While John is out of town, Mark will be personally liable for any damage Mark allows to come to the car. Now, Susan, John’s sister, comes to Mark a few days after John leaves on his trip and demands the car to be given to her; and tells Mark that permission or ownership has been given to her by John. Having not been told of this by John, and not wanting to violate the trust given to him by John, Mark tells Susan she cannot have the car.
Similarly, the funds and assets held in the public trust have been deposited into trust, and there is a very specific way the true owner and beneficiary may gain these funds. Making a demand for them, without doing much more, and without respecting the trust that was formed places each S.P.C. adherent in the position of Susan. This is the reason the public trustees refuse to acknowledge the demands of the typical S.P.C., and why they are correct in doing so. When properly comprehended, as set out by Academy for the Self Govering, there is a reason the demands are not honored, and there is a means to being acknowledged and respected as the rightful beneficiary and have the standing one seeks. Unfortunately, it is not found in the S.P.C. process.